This is one of the highest suspension bridges in the world, Royal Gorge Bridge across the Arkansas River in Colorado.
It’s over 1000 feet from the bridge to the river below. And what do you put at the bottom of a gorge like this?
A train, of course. I wanted the motion to show through but also wanted the viewer to be able to read the train name. Can you feel the wind rushing by?
It’s an interesting geography. There’s this mountain ridge that has been eroded into a gorge spectacularly deep and narrow. Yet a few miles in either direction of the bridge the land is relatively flat, as if the mountains just popped up in the middle of a prairie. The river simply refused to budge so as the mountains rose upward the river cut into them and kept its bed at the same level.
Looking at a topo map of the area and it seems explorers literally had to climb a mountain ridge in order to peer down into the gorge, which is about the same level as the plains they climbed up from. The West has some really strange landscapes.
And an interesting sense of humor. Remember the bridge is over 1000 feet above the water?
Vacation or photo safari? Always a question when traveling and not for an assignment. Like many outdoor photographers I like to “document” places I visit. Sometimes it’s just to remember what I saw, sometimes to get some perspectives on a place I plan to come back to for more images.
This image was one of those occasions. Visited here because it showed up on a tourist guide of the area then found some interesting compositions. Fortunately I had my tripod and assortment of lenses to use. One great thing about places you can drive right up to is having all your gear in the car!
Seven Falls, Colorado Springs
What attracted me to this composition was the abrupt change in the water’s flow and the way the wet rocks were reflecting the light in the sky. I knew this was going to be a B&W image and that I wanted the water to have a nice flow rather than be stopped in time. The tripod enabled a long exposure and the shorter lens let me put more of the falls in the composition.
So what if I hadn’t carried along all that gear? Would there be a way to get a similar image? What about other tourists who have point-and-shoot cameras or their cellphones? What would they make? At the time, probably nothing like this.
Friend of mine asked recently about available compact cameras that would give the versatility of a DSLR for dynamic range, depth of field, and varying focal length. He likes putting something in his travel bag or pocket that will deliver very nice results but not require hauling around lots of gear. At the time I didn’t have a good recommendation but soon after that I ran across a different type of compact camera. This one uses multiple lenses and processing software to enable the photographer to capture several versions of a composition and then create the final image with the characteristics desired. There have been variations on this idea in the past years but it seems the company behind this idea, Light.co, has found the right combination of technologies and design features to meet my friend’s needs.
Photography used to be about skills and technical knowledge, mainly because the tools and processes required those in order to get the final result. Now the result can be shared in the blink of an eye (no more chemicals and special materials to create a print) and the capture almost with a glance. Kodak’s original statement was along the lines of, “you push the button, we do the rest” which if you think about it, is how photography is these days. There’s seemingly no effort required.
Is this a terrible change to a 100+ year human endeavor? I don’t believe it is. Now the “technology” of photography can stop being in the way of the creation of photographs. Today if you don’t like your images you pretty much can’t blame the equipment! Even the most casual tourist has the chance to create a wonderful experience to share with others – all they have to do is pay attention to what they are seeing.
Much of this part of Wisconsin has been farmed in one way or another. Only the wetlands have generally escaped being plowed and cultivated. Doesn’t mean there isn’t plenty of trees and parkland around. As farming became more concentrated the small plots were left alone or acquired by towns. Over time these have become places where the landscape of the Upper Midwest starts re-emerging.
As such, wander around the woods enough and you’ll spot signs the woods are a recent return to nature. Old foundations, lingering roads, straight lines of trees or shrubbery all indicate people had a hand transforming the area in some way. Sometimes you don’t even need an imagination – the signs are obvious.
Farm implements left in the woods – out of place and yet the right place to put equipment that once had its day on this ground but is now surrounded by returning natives.
The photography adage is the best camera to have is the one you have with you. For a week I kept mine in the car to simply be ready. Most of the week was pretty gloomy with clouds and fog but that just makes me pay more attention to forms and how shapes work together. Of course black and white is the only way to portray such so here’s the best from the past week.
Lifelong exposure to the prevailing wind gives the trees near Lake Michigan a definite angle, like they are leaning toward the water.
Pretty traditional composition for prairies and trees – just finding a way to show off the clouds.
A rigid shape among the organic forms, displaying its own tribute to the waves in the lake below.
Leading lines – will they merge in the distance?